Small target, big disappointment
/> Illustration:
The government is the way to go for Gillard Tony Abbott in power. The scandals of compounding and the smell only confirm the impossibility that Julia Gillard can somehow convince the voters to rethink his bad opinion of her and her government.
The collapse of the scope of work, go to the Labour leadership and Labour vote at the state and federal level, an Abbott extraordinary opportunity to set the Liberals in power for many years. But Abbott’s opposition is not ready for power. Abbott has, under its previous state Liberal opposition. When Ted Baillieu in Victoria and New South Wales, Barry O’Farrell, has successfully made the government the ultimate goal, while a “small target”.Advertisement: Story continues below
This is the conquest of power, strengthened the mistakes of the government and not the virtues of the opposition. This will stir up anger over the incumbent, instead of burning hope, in the alternative government. And it works. Anger is the emotion of the original policy. As the German philosopher Peter Sloterdijk points out: “At the beginning of the first sentence to the European tradition, in the first verse of the Iliad , ‘anger’ the word occurs.” Homer wrote the nasty war hero Achilles. Australian war hero angry, Abbott has successfully led the prosecution of Gillard, is but a small target. A “small target” is a holiday that offers a minimum of the electorate -. A minimum program, a minimum set of policies, and as few details as possible
Gillard is a tiresome, his prime minister, without a transactional skerrick of vision and show the standard errors of political judgment, but that does not Abbott is a good leader.
The former Liberal Premier of Victoria, Jeff Kennett, put it this way: “If you Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott, where she will ask to Australia in 2050, I think, look at you with blank expressions, and much more . the Prime Minister are in the same category. “Abbott has a vision, but it is undeniable as far Gillard is limited, do not offer a viable alternative, or even credible. Therefore, the Coalition primary vote is so high personal approval rating, while Abbott is low.
The primary voting records, the judgment of the voters against Gillard. The approval is a measure of personal opinion of the electorate Abbott. The latest Nielsen poll for the Herald showed the Coalition primary vote jumped by 47 percent, 27 against his own grief But Abbott’s index was down 17 percent. This is only slightly better than minus 23 Gillard. This data classifies them both as leaders unpopular. Gillard is unmistakably losing, winning, Abbott is very ambiguous. An angry warrior, as a prosecutor is to destroy it, not to build. The ‘small target’ approach is a smart way to power for the opposition, and the preparation for it scare to win a government. Clocka” target” precursor Abbott small liberal state, Baillieu and O’Farrell. Both have to be a disappointment in a year or so.
They show us that it is very simple, the opportunity to power without a firm intention to have a majority without a warrant to be missed. O’Farrell took office promising to be the “premier infrastructure.” Hallelujah, he thought long suffering people of NSW. advance, but the hallmark of the infrastructure, as far as his refusal to build a second airport is to be supported. He is now with the owners of the monopoly of the airport in Sydney, Macquarie Group, the only people in the country, that it is not necessary to be argued. The federal government is prepared to support a second airport, but not the Premier. O’Farrell real problem is that he did not campaign on the idea, so do not feel able to respond to it – a first by a majority, but not a mandate. It is a timid leader whose ambition is to get nothing but offend no one. Searches for a target of small dimensions will be. The result is that its small target now is the future of small, Sydney. Worse still, as Sydney is the main hub of the country, it is a national problem. The costs are strangling growth and opportunity for many years. urgent Sydney suffering from a serious problem of violent crime, with daily shootings. O’Farrell tells us in his words, that we have a “big war between Bikie gangs” in progress. was built for months, while the government O’Farrell was mainly concerned with the breaking of the will of the police union, that they had violated payments injuries to police officers in the line of duty cutting concern. O’Farrell What are you doing? And damage to the morale of the police, by cutting off rights of the injury, he does nothing more than entertainment. He said the ban on Bikie gang members wear their colors in a variety of bars. What is a campaign against here? Crimes of Fashion? And he says, a judge for the granting of the guarantee to a Bikie fire to a van load of police accused. This pulse is only its own inertia. O’Farrell had an idea worse. Gillard has asked to look at the steps in order to suppress national organized crime gangs and gun crime. This is an excellent idea to have state borders porous to gangs and guns. Gillard, to his credit, has accepted the proposal. He tried, the federal-state meeting to follow, was that it be the venue for the action. inexplicably has repeatedly failed O’Farrell, given the opportunities to take him to pursue the matter, more recently, when he was at the table for the meeting of the Council of Australian Government. In short, the policy response O’Farrell was ridiculous. Its small-target approach has allowed to power many of the criminal purpose. The situation in Victoria is different, but the theme is the same. A new Liberal govern ment took power in a small target strategy, and almost immediately disappoint the voters with his agenda for the poor and the inaction on critical issues. The risk is that a government is to reduce Abbott in Australia, as it is disappointing O’Farrell NSW and Victoria Baillieu. He still has time to solve this problem. In fact, has signaled that he wants. In a speech this year said that the Australians are optimists looking for a “pragmatic problem-solving government.” He promised that the ideas and strategies that would provide exactly the type to be known. But he has trouble from negative to positive. Just yesterday, gave a lecture at the Institute for Public Affairs, which began with the celebration of the beautiful story of Australia’s positive contributions to world events. “We need for something in the rest of the world are and should use our reach and sway to preserve Australia’s best interests and values to prom ote,” said Abbott. This is an interesting topic that Abbott was developed to demonstrate his ideas. But the conversation quickly returned to familiar form, as reported by Labor Minister. The conclusion of the speech of thought. “We have a great country and great people disappointed by a bad government, but that will happen, if have this year or next year, we will soon be an opportunity to judge the current Australian government. I know you can use the waste to the debt and to stop the boat as it previously did. “serious members of the team of Abbott are deeply worried. You are getting closer to power, but no closer to a serious, credible alternative government. “We are all concerned that we win by an overwhelming majority with a mandate for anything,” says a Liberal frontbench. “We have a mandate to removed the carbon tax and mining tax and some other things that then? Tony focuses on the experience of John Hewson. But we were able to bring anything into our platform and still win the election.”
Abbott was working as press spokesman Hewson, a former economics professor has his Fightback manifesto, a detailed set of proposals for economic reform, which plans to have to bring the government in the elections of 1993 produced. Abbott spokesman Andrew Robb has financial, the Liberal campaign director during the same experience. Paul Keating led a successful campaign against the fear of the plan; Hewson lost “the election can not miss” agai nst an unpopular minister first. It was a bitter moment for the Liberals. But it is quite possible, a positive program, without offering a detailed manifesto of radical politics of biblical length, as well as Hewson. Kennett, who was unpopular for its critical repairs in Victoria, but is now recognized as a great prime minister, argues that it is not only necessary, but the Australians are a little more than anger and desire to small targets. “If you look at the results of the elections in NSW and more recently in Queensland are looking for, the public desperately needs leadership. E ‘to this agenda-setting is so important. When Julia Gillard and Tony articulate Abbott was a vision, I think the public would buy into it. Opposition should offer a real alternative political voice in the elections later this year. “The last year is fast approaching. Abbott has to offer even more time and opportunity, not as something other than Gillard.
Peter Hartcher is the political editor .
No comments:
Post a Comment